Pages

Search blog and web

Wives are 7 times more likely to take back their cheating husband

I read that wives are 7 times more likely to take back their cheating husband than the other way around.

If true, how do you explain it?


This is my theory:

To be biologically successful you have to reproduce. Traits that caused people to have kids and raise them until they became fertile adults were selected for.

Before DNA women knew who their biological kids were and men didn't.

Women wanted a stable good provider to increase the chance that their children would survive. The reason that she didn't want her mate to fool around with another woman is that he might give the OW scarce resources and thereby decrease the chance of her kid's survival.

The sex act itself with the OW wasn't that important. Kids he had with the OW could starve.

Men wanted to use the fruits of their labor to ensure the survival of their own kids, not some OMs kids. That's why a faithful mate and the act of sex were important to men.

The DNA of men who had no problem feeding some OM's kid wasn't passed along.

In reconciliation:

The WH was offering his resources to ensure the survival of his wife's kids (she knows they are hers).

The WW was asking her husband to support kids that may not be his given her record.

IFTTT

Put the internet to work for you.

Turn off or edit this Recipe

No comments:

Post a Comment