So, after browsing through several threads, i've come across a somewhat simplistic method of defining men of either being an 'alpha' or 'beta'.
One of the main points, as it appears, seems to be that an 'alpha' will be confident despite any sort of complexities belonging to the state of the relationship between male and female (the distinction between 'alpha' and beta' doesn't seem to be any clearer as it comes to same-sex relationships). The reverse of that has also been speculated to be a defining feature of 'beta'.
What are your thoughts on this 'alpha' and 'beta' distinction?
Is it coherent and can it adequately satisfy the characteristics of men into two camps?
Or are those who endorse that distinction, male and female, relying on a less sophisticated account of people in regards to romantic relationships?
Put the internet to work for you.
No comments:
Post a Comment