| I was a little intrigued by the topic on a different post so thought to hear some more opinions. I find sex in the marriage amazing - loving, safe, comforting. How is it compared to no-string attached sex , which is wild, adventurous, maybe a little bit naughtier or kinkier ? I call sex in the marriage"making love", while no attached sex, is just relief. Another thing that got my attention is that men get bothered if their wife explored the sexual field and had several or a lot of previous partners. Why does that bother you? Is it a territorial thing - I want nobody else to have touched what is mine, I want only me to feel this pleasure ? Or, is it the thought that someone else "had" your wife in bed, therefore she is "used goods" ? I'd like to say my POV on this. Sex is a consensual act between two people, whose purpose is MUTUAL pleasure. So, I find it a preconception to think a men "had" a woman in bed, like he used her, he had his way with her. Who uses who, in sex? They BOTH are willing participants. They BOTH do it for pleasure. So, it works the other way to think the woman "had" the man in bed. Why is it if a woman had no-strong attached sex, she has been "used", or "wasted", or "given away", versus a man who slept with various women? There is equality between sexes nowadays, after all. In my opinion, nobody uses anybody. Nobody "had" anybody in bed. It's like two partners dancing together. They choose to, because they BOTH enjoying it and relaxes them. I haven't heard of anyone saying they have been "had" and "used" for dance. So, don't you think it's time for us to broaden our views on sex? Love to hear your insight ! | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|
No comments:
Post a Comment