Can a WS be honest while doing damage control?
I say no.
People may argue over what they call semantics. Bill Clinton said he did not have sex with that woman. He tried to play with words hiding behind that receiving oral sex is not sex.
For a WS to say they F'd their AP is admitting they cheated.
Though to follow up and then use words to do damage control to lessen the impact of their actions. To make what they did appear to not be as bad. That damage control statement undermines them admitting they had a PA.
The WS is using semantics.
That is not being honest.
I am sure people have seen WS's that do not hide behind semantics. They are honest and to be respected. Because they fully own what they did.
To be a WS that repeatedly says I had sex with the AP does nothing. Specially when no one doubts that she did after the first time they admitted it.
Repeating that they had sex with the AP 100 times will never make up for them referring to their affair as something less then what it was.
A person that had 4 AP's can not just say they were unfaithful. That they are a WS.
When they are a serial cheater.
Just the way a person can not call their affair a ONS when they had an EA then PA and call it a ONS.
I say no.
People may argue over what they call semantics. Bill Clinton said he did not have sex with that woman. He tried to play with words hiding behind that receiving oral sex is not sex.
For a WS to say they F'd their AP is admitting they cheated.
Though to follow up and then use words to do damage control to lessen the impact of their actions. To make what they did appear to not be as bad. That damage control statement undermines them admitting they had a PA.
The WS is using semantics.
That is not being honest.
I am sure people have seen WS's that do not hide behind semantics. They are honest and to be respected. Because they fully own what they did.
To be a WS that repeatedly says I had sex with the AP does nothing. Specially when no one doubts that she did after the first time they admitted it.
Repeating that they had sex with the AP 100 times will never make up for them referring to their affair as something less then what it was.
A person that had 4 AP's can not just say they were unfaithful. That they are a WS.
When they are a serial cheater.
Just the way a person can not call their affair a ONS when they had an EA then PA and call it a ONS.
Put the internet to work for you.
No comments:
Post a Comment